British Journal of Criminology Advance Access published online on February 21, 2008
British Journal of Criminology, doi:10.1093/bjc/azn013
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The British Journal of Criminology 0:azn013 (2008)
© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies (ISTD). All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Restorative Justice and Child Sex Offences
The Theory and the Practice
* University of New South Wales; a.cossins{at}unsw.edu.au.
| Abstract |
|---|
Restorative justice advocates have made a number of claims about the effectiveness of restorative justice in relation to sexual assault crimes, such as its ability to defuse power relations between the parties and heal the harm. This article examines whether or not restorative justice is one of the ways forward in the difficult area of prosecuting child sex offences by re-analysing some of the data reported in Daly (2006) and comparing restorative justice with other reforms to the sexual assault trial. It concludes that there is insufficient evidence to support the view that there are inherent benefits in the restorative justice process that provide victims of sexual assault with a superior form of justice.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Daly Setting the Record Straight and A Call for Radical Change: A Reply to Annie Cossins on 'Restorative Justice and Child Sex Offences' Br. J. Criminol., July 1, 2008; 48(4): 557 - 566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
