British Journal of Criminology Advance Access published online on December 14, 2006
British Journal of Criminology, doi:10.1093/bjc/azl094
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge, Sidgwick Avenue, Cambridge, CB3 9DT
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. This paper critiques the approach of identifying best practice projects and discusses the problem with simply transferring projects into different contexts. The argument is illustrated by explaining the evaluation process of three domestic violence projects which all had the same aim, which was to reduce domestic violence. The evaluated projects all delivered advocacy programmes and were located in disadvantaged areas in the United Kingdom. A more suitable evaluation approach is proposed whereby practice principles are transferred rather than projects and this is presented in the form of a practice model.
Article
Evaluating Domestic Violence Initiatives
Alpa Parmar 1 * and Alice Sampson 2
2 Centre for Institutional Studies, University of East London, Docklands Campus, 4-6 University Way, London, E16 2RD
Alpa Parmar, E-mail: ap239{at}cam.ac.uk
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Hernandez, P. Robson, and A. Sampson Towards Integrated Participation: Involving Seldom Heard Users of Social Care Services Br. J. Soc. Work, September 9, 2008; (2008) bcn118v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Sampson Developing Robust Approaches to Evaluating Social Programmes Evaluation, October 1, 2007; 13(4): 477 - 493. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||

