British Journal of Criminology Advance Access originally published online on May 30, 2009
British Journal of Criminology 2009 49(4):439-450; doi:10.1093/bjc/azp038
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The British Journal of Criminology 49:439-450 (2009)
© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies (ISTD). All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Restorative Justice for Banks Through Negative Licensing
* Regulatory Institutions Network, College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia; John.Braithwaite{at}anu.edu.au
| Abstract |
|---|
The most general lesson of the crime prevention literature is taken to be that repeat victimization and repeat offending are concentrated in time and space; early intervention to prevent wider inflammation of such hot spots is more effective than reactive general deterrence (as in economic models of crime). That prescription is applied to how the 2008 financial crisis might have been prevented and how the crimes of Enron and Arthur Andersen might have been tackled to ameliorate the 2001 crisis. Negative licensing based on walking the beat and kicking the tyres at financial hot spots, with reduced reliance on economic models of risk, is one remedy advocated. Then, the threat of negative licensing might be used to motivate restorative justice that transforms the ethical culture, particularly the bonus culture, of banks.
Key Words: global financial crisis regulation financial crime restorative justice