Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MATIVAT, F.
Right arrow Articles by TREMBLAY, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The British Journal of Criminology 37:165-183 (1997)
© 1997 Centre for Crime & Justice Studies (formerly ISTD)


RESEARCH-ARTICLE

COUNTERFEITING CREDIT CARDS

Displacement Effects, Suitable Offenders and Crime Wave Patterns

FRANÇOIS MATIVAT and PIERRE TREMBLAY*

A displacement-induced crime wave model assumes that changes in crime opportunities will motivate a significant subset of offenders to engage in similar crime switching adaptations, expectation being that the crime wave will therefore be associated with a concomitant decrease in other related offences. This paper locates a particular crime wave (a 1992–94 wave in counterfeit credit card frauds), identifies a set of related offences (stolen-based credit card frauds) and argues that the expected displacement effect triggered by the marketing of compact and efficient encoding and embossing equipment (as well as sophisticated photocopying and printing devices) did not materialize, in practice, at least in the setting we have analysed (Montreal). Even though stolen-based and altered credit card frauds were tightly related offences and involved a homogeneous population of offenders, the actual difference in pay-off was not significant enough to trigger systematic switching in crime tactic preferences; moreover, offenders willing to participate in sophisticated ‘pure’ counterfeit credit card frauds could not, as a matter of fact, take advantage of such an option even if they wished to do so (mainly because they did not have the right (ethnic) connections).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Contemporary Criminal JusticeHome page
M. LEVI
Offender Organization and Victim Responses: Credit Card Fraud in International Perspective
Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, November 1, 1998; 14(4): 368 - 383.
[Abstract]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.