Skip Navigation


British Journal of Criminology Advance Access originally published online on August 3, 2007
British Journal of Criminology 2007 47(6):918-937; doi:10.1093/bjc/azm026
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
47/6/918    most recent
azm026v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, L.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The British Journal of Criminology 47:918-937 (2007)
© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies (ISTD). All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

A MULTILEVEL ANALYSIS OF THE RISK OF HOUSEHOLD BURGLARY IN THE CITY OF TIANJIN, CHINA

Lening Zhang*, Steven F. Messner and Jianhong Liu

Steven F. Messner is affiliated to the Department of Sociology at the University at Albany, SUNY and Jianhong Liu to the Department of Sociology at Rhode Island College

* Correspondence to Lening Zhang, Department of Behavioral Sciences, Saint Francis University, Loretto, PA 15940, USA; lzhang{at}francis.edu.


   Abstract

This study applies the integrated, multilevel framework developed in the West to explain variation in the risk of household burglary within the city of Tianjin, China. The analytic framework consists of three sets of determinants: household variables, neighbourhood structural factors, and neighbourhood social control processes. The selection of variables is guided by routine activities/lifestyle theories and the social disorganization perspective, adapted to reflect features of urban China. The results of multilevel regression modeling reveal that indicators of target attractiveness (household income) and guardianship (length of residence and ‘somebody home’) exhibit the predicted effects on the risk of household burglary. Similarly, the effects of two of the neighbourhood process variables—collective efficacy and public control—conform to theoretical expectations and findings in Western research. The results for the neighbourhood structural factors are inconsistent with those widely reported in the West. These analyses demonstrate the applicability of elements of Western criminological theory to contemporary urban China but also reveal important differences in the ecological dynamics of crime across contexts.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Research in Crime and DelinquencyHome page
L. Mazerolle, R. Wickes, and J. McBroom
Community Variations in Violence: The Role of Social Ties and Collective Efficacy in Comparative Context
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, February 1, 2010; 47(1): 3 - 30.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br J CriminolHome page
L. Zhang, S. F. Messner, J. Liu, and Y. A. Zhuo
Guanxi and Fear of Crime in Contemporary Urban China
Br. J. Criminol., July 1, 2009; 49(4): 472 - 490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J CriminolHome page
J. Xu
The Robbery of Motorcycle Taxi Drivers (Dake Zai) in China: A Lifestyle/Routine Activity Perspective and Beyond
Br. J. Criminol., July 1, 2009; 49(4): 491 - 512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.