Skip Navigation


British Journal of Criminology Advance Access originally published online on June 13, 2007
British Journal of Criminology 2007 47(5):764-778; doi:10.1093/bjc/azm014
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
47/5/764    most recent
azm014v3
azm014v2
azm014v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scoular, J.
Right arrow Articles by O'Neill, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The British Journal of Criminology 47:764-778 (2007)
© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies (ISTD). All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Regulating Prostitution

Social Inclusion, Responsibilization and the Politics of Prostitution Reform

Jane Scoular and Maggie O'Neill*

* Jane Scoular, School of Law, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G4 OLT; jane.scoular{at}strath.ac.uk. Maggie O'Neill, Department of Social Sciences, University of Loughborough, Leicestershire LE11 3TU; m.oneill{at}lboro.ac.uk.


  Abstract

Following Matthews' (2005) recent examination of prostitution's changing regulatory framework, we offer a critical account of the move from ‘enforcement’ (punishment) to ‘multi-agency’ (regulatory) responses as, in part, a consequence of new forms of governance. We focus on the increasing salience of exiting—a move favoured by Matthews as signalling a renewed welfare approach, but one which, when viewed in the wider context of ‘progressive governance’, offers insight into New Labour's attempt to increase social control under the rhetoric of inclusion, through techniques of risk and responsibilization. By exploring the moral and political components of these techniques, we demonstrate how they operate to privilege and exclude certain forms of citizenship, augmenting the on-going hegemonic moral and political regulation of sex workers.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Crime Media CultureHome page
M. O'Neill, R. Campbell, P. Hubbard, J. Pitcher, and J. Scoular
Living with the Other: Street sex work, contingent communities and degrees of tolerance
Crime Media Culture, April 1, 2008; 4(1): 73 - 93.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Sex. Transm. Infect.Home page
M D E Goodyear
Incarceration of female sex workers in China and STI/HIV. Programmes that are not rights-based are doomed to fail
Sex. Transm. Inf., February 1, 2008; 84(1): 1 - 2.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.