Skip Navigation


British Journal of Criminology Advance Access originally published online on December 14, 2006
British Journal of Criminology 2007 47(4):671-691; doi:10.1093/bjc/azl094
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
47/4/671    most recent
azl094v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parmar, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sampson, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The British Journal of Criminology 47:671-691 (2007)
© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies (ISTD). All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Evaluating Domestic Violence Initiatives

Alpa Parmar and Alice Sampson*

* Alpa Parmar, Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge. Alice Sampson, Centre for Institutional Studies, University of East London. Addresses for correspondence: Alpa Parmar, Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge, Sidgwick Avenue, Cambridge, CB3 9DT; ap239{at}cam.ac.uk. Alice Sampson, Centre for Institutional Studies, University of East London, Docklands Campus, 4–6 University Way, London, E16 2RD; A.Sampson{at}uel.ac.uk.


  Abstract

This paper critiques the approach of identifying ‘best practice’ projects and discusses the problem with simply transferring projects into different contexts. The argument is illustrated by explaining the evaluation process of three domestic violence projects which all had the same aim, which was to reduce domestic violence. The evaluated projects all delivered advocacy programmes and were located in disadvantaged areas in the United Kingdom. A more suitable evaluation approach is proposed whereby practice principles are transferred rather than projects and this is presented in the form of a ‘practice model’.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J Soc WorkHome page
L. Hernandez, P. Robson, and A. Sampson
Towards Integrated Participation: Involving Seldom Heard Users of Social Care Services
Br. J. Soc. Work, September 9, 2008; (2008) bcn118v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 EvaluationHome page
A. Sampson
Developing Robust Approaches to Evaluating Social Programmes
Evaluation, October 1, 2007; 13(4): 477 - 493.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.