British Journal of Criminology Advance Access originally published online on October 7, 2005
British Journal of Criminology 2006 46(4):561-586; doi:10.1093/bjc/azi091
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The British Journal of Criminology 46:561-586 (2006)
© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies (ISTD). All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Fall of the ‘Platonic Guardians’
Liberalism, Criminology and Political Responses to Crime in England and Wales
* Centre for Criminology, University of Oxford. Address for correspondence: Manor Road Building, Manor Road, Oxford OX1 3UQ, UK; ian.loader{at}crim.ox.ac.uk.
This paper offers a critical reconstruction and reinterpretation of the disposition towards the governance of crime that was ascendant in England and Wales during the middle decades of the twentieth century—namely, liberal elitism, or what I term ‘Platonic guardianship’. Drawing upon documentary sources, and extended oral history/biographical interviews with retired Home Office officials, penal reformers and criminologists, I examine the express and implied values and beliefs that constitute this take on political responsibility towards crime and the public passions it arouses, and consider the senses in which it may be plausibly described, ideologically, as liberal. I then explore three ‘moments’ of contention during which the legitimacy of liberal elitism was called into question over the last several decades—the ‘nothing works’ assault on rehabilitation in the 1970s, the rise of ‘law and order’ politics in the 1980s, and the populist and punitive turn taken by penal politics since 1993. In each case, I outline briefly the nature of the charges levelled at the commitments and practices of Platonic guardianship and assess—drawing upon the interview material—the perceived scale and effects of each challenge. I conclude by reflecting on the sociological preconditions and normative limitations of Platonic guardianship as a mode of rule, and on what we may draw from it today in our efforts to make sense of, and transcend, the febrile contemporary politics of crime.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. Parr Family Intervention Projects: A Site of Social Work Practice Br. J. Soc. Work, October 1, 2009; 39(7): 1256 - 1273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. King and S. Maruna Is a conservative just a liberal who has been mugged?: Exploring the origins of punitive views Punishment Society, April 1, 2009; 11(2): 147 - 169. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Pratt Scandinavian Exceptionalism in an Era of Penal Excess: Part II: Does Scandinavian Exceptionalism Have a Future? Br. J. Criminol., May 1, 2008; 48(3): 275 - 292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Ryan Book review: Penal populism, John Pratt. London: Routledge, 2007. 210 pp Punishment Society, October 1, 2007; 9(4): 437 - 439. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Murphy and N. Whitty Risk and Human Rights in UK Prison Governance Br. J. Criminol., September 1, 2007; 47(5): 798 - 816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Yarwood The geographies of policing Progress in Human Geography, August 1, 2007; 31(4): 447 - 465. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Karstedt Explorations into the sociology of criminal justice and punishment: leaving the modernist project behind History of the Human Sciences, May 1, 2007; 20(2): 51 - 70. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|