Skip Navigation


British Journal of Criminology Advance Access originally published online on April 8, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
44/3/369    most recent
azh024v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hillyard, P.
Right arrow Articles by Whyte, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The British Journal of Criminology 44:369-390 (2004)
British Journal of Criminology 44(3) © the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies (ISTD) 2004; all rights reserved

Leaving a ‘Stain upon the Silence’

Contemporary Criminology and the Politics of Dissent

Paddy Hillyard*, Joe Sim{dagger}, Steve Tombs{dagger} and Dave Whyte{ddagger}

* School of Policy Studies, University of Ulster.
{dagger} School of Social Science, Liverpool John Moores University.
{ddagger} Centre for Criminal Justice Studies, University of Leeds.

Author for correspondence: Joe Sim, Professor of Criminology, School of Social Science, Liverpool, John Moores University, Henry Cotton Campus, 15–21 Webster Street, Liverpool, L3 2ET. Tel.: 0151 231 4061; j.sim{at}livjm.ac.uk.

If academic criminology currently stands in rude health, this obscures a range of deeply disturbing trends in the content of the discipline. We begin by exploring the recent boom in Home Office funded research in criminology, examining the key theoretical and empirical issues that have been both included and excluded from the official research agenda. The content and expanding nature of this agenda is then placed within the wider context of the entrepreneurialisation of universities, particularly with respect to the marketisation of academic research and the disciplinary, self-regulatory effects that follow from this. As a paradigmatic process within these wider trends, we subject the Research Assessment Exercise to critical scrutiny. We conclude by noting some strategies that criminologists might pursue to combat the increasingly narrow and pernicious research agenda funded and sanctioned by the state.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J CriminolHome page
S. Walklate
What is to be Done About Violence Against Women?: Gender, Violence, Cosmopolitanism and the Law
Br. J. Criminol., January 1, 2008; 48(1): 39 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J CriminolHome page
T. Murphy and N. Whitty
Risk and Human Rights in UK Prison Governance
Br. J. Criminol., September 1, 2007; 47(5): 798 - 816.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J Soc WorkHome page
P. M. Garrett
Making 'Anti-Social Behaviour': A Fragment on the Evolution of 'ASBO Politics' in Britain
Br. J. Soc. Work, July 1, 2007; 37(5): 839 - 856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J CriminolHome page
S. Tombs
'Violence', Safety Crimes and Criminology
Br. J. Criminol., July 1, 2007; 47(4): 531 - 550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Critical Social PolicyHome page
P. M. Garrett
'Sinbin' solutions: The 'pioneer' projects for 'problem families' and the forgetfulness of social policy research
Critical Social Policy, May 1, 2007; 27(2): 203 - 230.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theoretical CriminologyHome page
L. Chancer and E. McLaughlin
Public criminologies: Diverse perspectives on academia and policy
Theoretical Criminology, May 1, 2007; 11(2): 155 - 173.
[PDF]


Home page
Br J CriminolHome page
G. Mythen and S. Walklate
Criminology and Terrorism: Which Thesis? Risk Society or Governmentality?
Br. J. Criminol., May 1, 2006; 46(3): 379 - 398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Critical Social PolicyHome page
J. J. Rodger
Antisocial families and withholding welfare support
Critical Social Policy, February 1, 2006; 26(1): 121 - 143.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
R. Coleman, S. Tombs, and D. Whyte
Capital, Crime Control and Statecraft in the Entrepreneurial City
Urban Stud, December 1, 2005; 42(13): 2511 - 2530.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.