Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Townsley, M.
Right arrow Articles by Chaseling, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The British Journal of Criminology 43:615-633 (2003)
© 2003 Centre for Crime & Justice Studies (formerly ISTD)

Infectious Burglaries. A Test of the Near Repeat Hypothesis

Michael Townsley, Ross Homel and Janet Chaseling*

*Michael Townsley and Ross Homel, School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Griffith University; Janet Chaseling, Australian School of Environmental Studies, Griffith University.

This paper explores one aspect of spatial dependence for the offence of burglary, utilising epidemiological methods for the study of infectious diseases to investigate the phenomenon of near repeat victimization. The near repeat burglary hypothesis states that proximity to a burgled dwelling increases burglary risk for those areas that have a high degree of housing homogeneity and that this risk is similar in nature to the temporarily heightened risk of becoming a repeat victim after an initial victimization. The near repeat hypothesis was tested on 34 months of police recorded burglary data across a high crime area of Brisbane, Australia. Near repeats were shown to exist in the study area, mainly in suburbs containing homogeneous housing. Little or no housing diversity, in terms of the type of physical construction and general appearance of dwellings, serves to restrict the extent of repeat victimization. Housing diversity allows offenders a choice of targets, and favoured targets will be ‘revisited’ by burglars. Near identical targets usually present no motive for an offender to favour one property over another. Thus in areas with low housing diversity, victim prevalence should be higher than in areas with heterogeneous housing.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 European Journal of CriminologyHome page
W. Bernasco
Them Again?: Same-Offender Involvement in Repeat and Near Repeat Burglaries
European Journal of Criminology, October 1, 2008; 5(4): 411 - 431.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J CriminolHome page
C. Nee and A. Meenaghan
Expert Decision Making in Burglars
Br. J. Criminol., September 1, 2006; 46(5): 935 - 949.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Agr. Econ.Home page
J. P. Prestemon and D. T. Butry
Time to Burn: Modeling Wildland Arson as an Autoregressive Crime Function
Am. J. Agr. Econ., August 1, 2005; 87(3): 756 - 770.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.