Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, A.
Right arrow Articles by Enterkin, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The British Journal of Criminology 41:707-725 (2001)
© 2001 Centre for Crime & Justice Studies (formerly ISTD)

Victim Contact Work in the Probation Service. Paradigm Shift or Pandora's Box?

Adam Crawford and Jill Enterkin

Centre for Criminal Justice Studies, University of Leeds
Department of Social Policy and Politics, Goldsmiths College

The 1990 Victim's Charter created an obligation for the Probation Service in England and Wales to contact the victims, or their families, of life sentence prisoners prior to any consideration of the offender's release to enquire whether they have anxieties about the release. In 1996 this was broadened to include the victims of ‘serious violent or sexual offences’. The implementation of the Victim's Charter requirements has been both hesitant and variable across different Probation Services. This paper considers some of the findings of a study of victim contact work in the Probation Service and their implications, particularly with regard to the views and experiences of victims. The research fieldwork focused on the practice response to the Victim's Charter requirements of two Probation Services, both of which had in place nationally recognized, coherent and yet different models of victim contact service delivery. This paper examines the impact of victim contact work upon victims, the management of offenders and the Probation Service. It explores some of the ambiguities and tensions in translating policy initiatives concerning the needs of victims into the delicate balance of criminal justice.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.