Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stevenson, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Weatherburn, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The British Journal of Criminology 41:101-118 (2001)
© 2001 Centre for Crime & Justice Studies (formerly ISTD)

The Stolen Goods Market in New South Wales, Australia

An Analysis of Disposal Avenues and Tactics

Richard J. Stevenson, Lubica M. V. Forsythe and Don Weatherburn*

Richard J. Stevenson, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia; Lubica M. V. Forsythe and Don Weatherburn, New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research, Attorney General’s Department, Sydney, NSW. The authors would like to thank Shyama Batra, Kerrie Bannister, Roseanne Bonney, Neil Bridge, Thalia Struve-Broughton, Christine Coumarelos, Julianne Elliot, Simon Eyland, Tony Jenkins, Bronwyn Lind, Peter O’Connor, Libby Ostinga, Jonno Nichol, Pia Salmelainen, Pat Ward, the Intelligence Officers of the Cabramatta Patrol, the NSW Department of Corrective Services, the NSW Department of Juvenile Justice, the NSW Police Service (who contributed substantially to the funding of the study) and many other individuals who greatly assisted the project. Finally, a special thanks is due to all the respondents who generously shared their experiences with us.

Lack of information about the stolen goods market has hampered its use by police as a means of controlling burglary rates. This study investigated how the market functions by interviewing 267 imprisoned burglars. It found that burglars used an average of four different methods of disposal. The most common was trading stolen goods directly for drugs—mainly heroin in adults and cannabis in juveniles. Other methods included selling to family/friends, fences, legitimate businesses, pawnbrokers and secondhand dealers. Disposal of stolen goods appeared efficient, profitable and low risk. Many goods were stolen on commission and disposed of quickly, often in under one hour from the burglary. Burglars obtained between 25–33 per cent of the new price for certain stolen goods, earned a median income of AUS$2,000 per week and gave little thought to being caught. Receivers stood to make considerable profits and were also unlikely to be apprehended. The implications of these data for controlling the flow of stolen goods are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Contemporary Criminal JusticeHome page
J. L. Schneider
Reducing the Illicit Trade in Endangered Wildlife: The Market Reduction Approach
Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, August 1, 2008; 24(3): 274 - 295.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.