| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The British Journal of Criminology 39:531-554 (1999)
© 1999 Centre for Crime & Justice Studies (formerly ISTD)
The rise and fall of New York murder: zero tolerance or crack's decline?
Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge
The striking reduction in homicide in New York City between 1991 and 1997 has been claimed as a great success for a 'new policing tactic dubbed 'zero tolerance' - the aggressive enforcement of minor offences. The evidence that changes in policing made 'all the difference' is largely circumstantial, however, Homicide rates were at an all-time high in 1990-91 and had begun to decline before any radical changes in policing policy were instituted. The 1985-91 'murder spike' has been attributed largely to the simultaneous expanding crack cocaine 'epidemic' so the subsequent reduction in murder is related logically to the contraction of crack cocaine markets in the 1990s. There is some tentative support for the impact of policing on an already falling crime rate, but the changes in policing between 1991 and 1997 cannot adequately be described as 'zero tolerance'. The author argues that the 'New York story' has been over-simplified and over-sold, and that 'zero tolerance' is an inappropriate language for police policy or practice.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  K. Beckett and A. Godoy A Tale of Two Cities: A Comparative Analysis of Quality of Life Initiatives in New York and Bogota Urban Stud, February 1, 2010; 47(2): 277 - 301. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Lum Community Policing or Zero Tolerance?: Preferences of Police Officers from 22 Countries in Transition Br. J. Criminol., November 1, 2009; 49(6): 788 - 809. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. E. McCabe The Narcotics Initiative: An Examination of the NYPD Approach to Drug Enforcement, 1995-2001 Criminal Justice Policy Review, June 1, 2009; 20(2): 170 - 187. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Millings Review: Researching Criminal Justice Series: Zero Tolerance Policing Maurice Punch Policy Press, 2007; pp 64; {pound}14.99, pbk ISBN: 978--1--84742--055--8 Probation Journal, March 1, 2009; 56(1): 78 - 79. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Y. Chen Impacts of "Three Strikes and You're Out" on Crime Trends in California and Throughout the United States Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, November 1, 2008; 24(4): 345 - 370. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H.-E. Sung and L. Richter Rational Choice and Environmental Deterrence in the Retention of Mandated Drug Abuse Treatment Clients Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, December 1, 2007; 51(6): 686 - 702. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Newburn and T. Jones Symbolizing crime control: Reflections on Zero Tolerance Theoretical Criminology, May 1, 2007; 11(2): 221 - 243. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Korander and J. Torronen Zero confidence in youths?: Experiences of the zero tolerance experiment in Finland Young, February 1, 2005; 13(1): 47 - 71. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Hubbard Cleansing the Metropolis: Sex Work and the Politics of Zero Tolerance Urban Stud, August 1, 2004; 41(9): 1687 - 1702. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Weisburd and J. E. Eck What Can Police Do to Reduce Crime, Disorder, and Fear? The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, May 1, 2004; 593(1): 42 - 65. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Jones and T. Newburn Policy convergence and crime control in the USA and the UK: Streams of influence and levels of impact JCriminology and Criminal Justice, May 1, 2002; 2(2): 173 - 203. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|