| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The British Journal of Criminology 38:623-634 (1998)
© 1998 Centre for Crime & Justice Studies (formerly ISTD)
RESEARCH-ARTICLE |
POLICING THE DROSS
A Social Disciplinary Model of Policing
* School of Law, University of Warwick
In this article I use the findings of an ethnographic study of police station procedures to explore the limitations of Packer's Crime Control and Due Process models of justice. Concentrating on the dynamics of police-detainee interaction in the significant minority of cases in which the police arrest individuals whom they have no intention of charging, I show that in such cases policing is not geared towards enforcement of the criminal law but towards the achievement of police-defined objectives. I argue that Packer's models are both legal models, and thus inadequate to the task of explaining what takes place in these cases. I present the argument that these cases are better explained by reference to a Social Disciplinary model of policing. This is a model which eschews concern for both legal and factual guilt, concentrating instead on the task of subordinating sections of society viewed as anti-police and innately criminal.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Roberts French Criminal Justice: A Comparative Account of the Investigation and Prosecution of Crime in France Br. J. Criminol., March 1, 2008; 48(2): 269 - 273. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Mcara and S. Mcvie The usual suspects?: Street-life, young people and the police JCriminology and Criminal Justice, February 1, 2005; 5(1): 5 - 36. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Hinton A distant reality: Democratic policing in Argentina and Brazil JCriminology and Criminal Justice, February 1, 2005; 5(1): 75 - 100. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. De Lint Autonomy, Regulation and the Police Beat Social Legal Studies, March 1, 2000; 9(1): 55 - 83. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||


