Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by STATTIN, H.
Right arrow Articles by STENBACKA, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The British Journal of Criminology 37:198-223 (1997)
© 1997 Centre for Crime & Justice Studies (formerly ISTD)


RESEARCH-ARTICLE

PERSONAL RESOURCES AS MODIFIERS OF THE RISK FOR FUTURE CRIMINALITY

An Analysis of Protective Factors in Relation to 18-Year-Old Boys

HÅKAN STATTIN, ANDERS ROMELSJÖ and MARLENE STENBACKA*

* Department of Social Science, Örebro University; Karolinska Institutet, Department of Public Health Sciences and Center for Alcohol and Drug Prevention, Huddinge

Within the frame of a protective-factors approach, an analysis of the role played by resource factors at the age of 18 for future risk of criminality was performed. Both behavioural and home-background risks were studied. The study group consisted of 7,577 Swedish conscripts followed in official registers from the age of 18 through to the age of 36. The hypothesis was advanced that among subjects with few behavioural risks at the age of 18, resource factors (physical, emotional, social, and cognitive factors relating to the individual) would have relatively limited consequences for future delinquency. However, among subjects with a history of adjustment problems, having strong resources available might counteract adverse behavioural factors. In line with the hypothesis, among subjects with high behavioural risk, those with no strong personal resources were convicted considerably more often in later life than their counterparts with many resources. This was as true for subjects with few home-background risks as for those with many. Few differences with regard to conviction rate were found between subjects with few and those with many documented resources among low-risk individuals. Analyses of the separate resource measures revealed that, among subjects with high behavioural risk, those with documented high resources with regard to intellectual capacity, emotional stability, social maturity and psychic energy were convicted significantly less often than high-risk subjects with no documented strong resources. It is concluded that greater attention should be paid in criminological research to individuals' risks and resources in analysing and making prognoses of criminality


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
European Journal of CriminologyHome page
H. Tham and H. von Hofer
Individual Prediction and Crime Trends
European Journal of Criminology, July 1, 2009; 6(4): 313 - 335.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Youth Violence and Juvenile JusticeHome page
J. F. Chapman, R. A. Desai, P. R. Falzer, and R. Borum
Violence Risk and Race in a Sample of Youth in Juvenile Detention: The Potential to Reduce Disproportionate Minority Confinement
Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, April 1, 2006; 4(2): 170 - 184.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.