| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The British Journal of Criminology 36:135-147 (1996)
© 1996 Centre for Crime & Justice Studies (formerly ISTD)
RESEARCH-ARTICLE |
THE ATTITUDES AND ACTIONS OF OTHERS
Tutelage and Sutherland's Theory of Differential Association
*Univenity of Victoria
Contemporary studies of Sutherland's differential association theory argue that people learn about crime predominantly or exclusively through exposure to attitudes and motives that legitimize such behaviours. I suggest that Sutherland's writings demonstrate an equal concern with more direct exposure to crime; that is, with tutelage in criminal methods. I test this interpretation with models of drug selling and theft among a sample of homeless youths. In both cases, models that include deviant associations, attitudes, and desires improve with the addition of a measure of tutelage. Disregarding the role of tutelage may, therefore, mis-specify the differential association process and encourage misinterpretations of findings that correspond with Sutherland's theory.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Stolzenberg and S. J. D'Alessio Co-Offending and the Age-Crime Curve Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, February 1, 2008; 45(1): 65 - 86. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. van Dijkum and H. Landsheer Experimenting with a Nonlinear Dynamic Model of Juvenile Criminal Behavior Simulation Gaming, December 1, 2000; 31(4): 479 - 490. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||

