Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ØDEGÂRD, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The British Journal of Criminology 35:525-542 (1995)
© 1995 Centre for Crime & Justice Studies (formerly ISTD)


RESEARCH-ARTICLE

LEGALITY AND LEGITIMACY

On Attitudes to Drugs and Social Sanctions

EINAR ØDEGÂRD*

* National Institute for Alcohol and Drug Research Oslo

In the democratic vision there should be opportunities for citizens to exercise power over government decisions. Legal and constitutional arrangements ought to be supported by public opinion. Therefore statutes should ideally mirror the dominant attitude of the population. In the drugs field, there has been a sharpening of sentences given in Norway and in a number of countries that cannot be matched in any other area in which society applies penal sanctions. This article raises the question of whether this trend in the level of punishment has developed in harmony with popular opinion, something which both supporters and opponents of penalties of greater severity seem to take for granted.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Homicide StudiesHome page
S. Herzog
Battered Women Who Kill: An Empirical Analysis of Public Perceptions of Seriousness in Israel From a Consensus Theoretical Perspective
Homicide Studies, November 1, 2006; 10(4): 293 - 319.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Crime DelinquencyHome page
S. Herzog
Plea Bargaining Practices: Less Covert, more Public Support?
Crime Delinquency, October 1, 2004; 50(4): 590 - 614.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.