The British Journal of Criminology 30:423-443 (1990)
© 1990 Centre for Crime & Justice Studies (formerly ISTD)
RESEARCH-ARTICLE |
IDEOLOGY, HEGEMONY, AND EMPIRICISM
Compliance Theories of Regulation
* Queen's University Ontario
** Wolverhampton Polytechnic
In this article we engage in an extended critique of the thesis that the illegal conduct of corporations necessarily calls for different forms of regulation than other kinds of law-breaking. The proponents of that view argue that the unique nature of such illegalities is one reason why they necessitate a particular type of enforcement attitude or response. They advocate a strategy that produces compliance through persuasion rather than through the threat of sanctions. Another reason advanced is that corporations are not, as many would have it, ‘amoral calculators’, but rather ‘political citizens’ who may indeed sometimes err but are more prone to organizational incompetence than deliberate wrongdoing. Thus they need advice rather than chastisement: regulatory agencies should act as consultants rather than policemen. We will take each element of this argument in turn and show that it is neither logically nor empirically persuasive. We will then turn to the issue of how to make corporate regulation more effective and show that this requires a consideration of both the most suitable strategies for the enforcement agencies to adopt and the most appropriate legal framework for determining the criminal responsibility of these corporations.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. Tombs and D. Whyte A Deadly Consensus: Worker Safety and Regulatory Degradation under New Labour Br. J. Criminol., October 13, 2009; (2009) azp063v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Almond An Inspector's-Eye View: The Prospective Enforcement of Work-Related Fatality Cases Br. J. Criminol., September 1, 2006; 46(5): 893 - 916. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Parker Reinventing Regulation within the Corporation: Compliance-Oriented Regulatory Innovation Administration Society, November 1, 2000; 32(5): 529 - 565. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. SOUTH A Green Field for Criminology?: A Proposal for a Perspective Theoretical Criminology, May 1, 1998; 2(2): 211 - 233. [Abstract]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. GROOMBRIDGE Masculinities and Crimes Against the Environment Theoretical Criminology, May 1, 1998; 2(2): 249 - 267. [Abstract]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. Pearce and S. Tombs Hazards, Law and Class: Contextualizing the Regulation of Corporate Crime Social Legal Studies, March 1, 1997; 6(1): 79 - 107. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Tombs Law, Resistance and Reform:'Regulating' Safety Crimes in the Uk Social Legal Studies, September 1, 1995; 4(3): 343 - 365. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Tombs Green for Danger? Environmental Protection and Safety Management in The UK Chemicals Industries Organization Environment, January 1, 1994; 8(3): 257 - 273. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Slapper Corporate Manslaughter: an Examination of the Determinants of Prosecutorial Policy Social Legal Studies, December 1, 1993; 2(4): 423 - 443. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. S. LOFQUIST Organizational Probation and the U.S. Sentencing Commission The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, January 1, 1993; 525(1): 157 - 169. [Abstract]
|
|